Zubac praised Yang Hansen for being very talented. He made 9 of 14 shots against the Blazers inside, but he praised Xiao Yang.

On October 27, after blasting 9 of 14 against the Blazers inside, Zubac praised Yang Hansen after the game. Split should have understood.

Yang Hansen had another performance of 2 points and 1 rebound. Facing the Clippers, he did his best in only 4 minutes and 20 seconds of playing time, and the rebound he grabbed was from the frontcourt. In terms of rebounds, at least when he was on the court, the Blazers' interior didn't suffer much. But in the end, the Blazers lost because Yang Hansen was abandoned in the second half and didn't play for a second. The Clippers also took this opportunity to beat the Blazers' interior.

The total score comparison between the two teams in the paint was 62:44. The Clippers scored 18 points more than the Trail Blazers in the paint alone. If you do the math, the final score difference between the two teams was 107:114, only 7 points apart. If there was no inside gap, the Trail Blazers would have won their opponent. When it comes to free throws, the Trail Blazers made 19 more free throws than the Clippers. The Trail Blazers scored 11 three-pointers, and the Clippers scored 12. The difference is about the same, but the difference lies in scoring inside. The Clippers scored 62 points in the paint and the Trail Blazers scored 44 points. This 18-point gap is a big hole that you can't fill with free throws or three-pointers.

Speaking of inside scoring, I have to talk about Clippers center Zunier. Zubac really played like O'Neal. He scored 21 points and 8 rebounds on 9 of 14 shots from the field, and his shooting percentage was an astonishing 64.3%. It can be said that he beat Klingen like a primary school student, but in the post-game interview, Zubac praised Yang Hansen.

Facing an interview with a Chinese reporter at that time, Zubac said directly on the sidelines: "I have been watching Yang Hansen's games. He is a very talented athlete, and the sky is his limit. Yang Hansen just needs to continue to train hard. It is very regrettable. Unfortunately, I didn't see much of his performance in this game, but Yang Hansen is a player with great potential. "

First he performed well and blew up the Blazers inside, and then turned around to praise a Blazers center who was abandoned in this game. What do you mean by Zubac? Doesn’t Split still understand? You didn't let Yang Hansen come in, so he penetrated the inside line. The Trail Blazers played a small lineup in the second half. As long as Klingen rested, they didn't need a center. The tallest one was Grant, who was 2.03 meters tall. So why could they guard Zunier?

The Clippers used a tactic later. While maintaining a lead of about 10 points, they crazily pressed for time and kept hitting the inside. No matter how the Blazers shot a three-pointer, you scored 3 points. I hit an inside shot and easily got 2 points, and you could only chase 1 point back. As long as you can't get rebounds, you'll be fine. Because of the height, the Blazers will definitely suffer. The five-small lineup is a strange trick, but it definitely can't play the entire second half. If the Blazers play like this, they might as well not hire a center.

After the game, the opponent's center praised a center on your side who was abandoned and could not play, saying that he has great potential and talent, and also said that it was a pity that he did not see him perform. So if Coach Split had listened to Zubac earlier and let Yang Hansen play more, would it still be the case now? If you don't let Xiao Yang play and you can't win the ball, it's really speechless. It shows that the coach is too bad. They have to play five primary schools every day, so how can they train Yang Hansen? The key is that they can't win if they don't train Yang Hansen. They have lost the watermelon and not picked up the sesame seeds.